Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: The Zookeeper’s Wife

Hot Take: Jessica Chastain is a phenomenal performer. The Zookeeper’s Wife is an emotional look at another story of courage and self-sacrifice during the Holocaust. It is likely to get lost amongst these films as many are great and this one is adequate. Did I mention Jessica Chastain is a phenomenal performer?

From the beginning, you realize The Zookeeper’s Wife isn’t going to always be easy to watch. However, for a film which details a heroic footnote to the widespread impact of the Holocaust during WWII, it often downplays the most depressing aspects of the story. It’s solemn nature also has a romantic and softer feel thanks to a strong lead performance from Jessica Chastain who portrays Antonina Zabinski, the titular character of the film.

The story revolves around Antonina and her husband Jan (Johan Heldenbergh) who run a zoo in Warsaw, Poland which is devastated by a bombing run by the Germans near the beginning of World War II. As the Germans infiltrate Poland and begin the internment of the heavy Jewish population of Poland, the Zabinski’s zoo is occupied by German troops. The Zabinskis are approached by Dr. Lutz Heck (Daniel Bruhl), Hitler’s zoologist, who offers to transfer their most prized specimens to the German zoo for safekeeping until after the war. Heck, an acquaintance of the Zabinskis prior to the war has his eyes on Antonina.

Desperate to keep the zoo from being completely wiped out and being pushed from their home and concerned for their close Jewish friends, the Zabinskis devise a plan to help Jews escape from the Warsaw Ghetto through the zoo which is turned into a pig farm with the permission of Dr. Heck. Despite the stress it puts on their own relationship, the Zabinskis heroically risk their lives to rescue hundreds of Jews from the Ghetto. We’ve seen this type of story told before (Schindler’s List comes to mind first) but the film has a rare softness that encompasses the cold, hard reality of the ramifications of the Holocaust that gives the film a different feel.

Much of that can be attributed to Chastain who gives yet another great performance as Antonina. The performance also poses a problem for the film as Chastain often becomes the center of attention over the film’s storyline which sometimes takes a back seat to her character’s presence on screen. The amazing selflessness of the Zabinskis is impossible to overshadow though as they risk everything to rescue not just their Jewish friends but perfect strangers who face peril at the hands of the Nazis.

It’s not one of the best Holocaust films which would explain its March placement on the movie schedule. However, the story of the Zabinskis and the Warsaw Zoo is big screen-worthy and even if it weren’t, Chastain’s performance is worth the price of admission.

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • Chastain
    In the last year, Chastain has turned in marvelous performances in two underrated films — Miss Sloane and this film — and even delivered in the much maligned The Huntsman: Winter’s War. This creates a lot of anticipation for Molly’s Game, the Aaron Sorkin film starring Chastain alongside Idris Elba and Kevin Costner.
  • Bruhl
    This feels like a backhanded compliment but we already knew Bruhl could competently portray a Nazi soldier from his work in Inglorious Basterds and he delivers a competent performance in The Zookeeper’s Wife in the same vein. His previous performance was better but this one is good, too.

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • By the “Book”
    This adaptation relied heavily on both the novel of the same name and the diaries of the Zabinskis. However, where the film goes more by the book than anything is in its storytelling style. It rarely if ever strays outside the lines which helps deliver an adequate film but prevents it from reaching Oscar-caliber.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest

Related

2017-04-09
By: Brian Joseph
On: April 9, 2017
In: 2017, Hot Take
Previous Post: Hot Take: Ghost in the Shell
Next Post: Hot Take: Going in Style

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.