Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: A Dog’s Purpose

Hot Take: Apparently, a dog’s purpose is to die on screen to manufacture tears from the audience. It isn’t the first time, it’s been done but it’s never been done with this frequency. Pure dog lover propaganda with dog abuse allegations as background noise don’t jive.

Your dog is going to die. I think that’s the point of A Dog’s Purpose. If you’re lucky enough, though, your next dog might be your old dog in a new body. I guess that’s the other point of A Dog’s Purpose. Trying to figure the point of this one, other than to make dog lovers screech, “Awwwwwww!” and children gleefully giggle, that’s the only logical conclusion.

A Dog’s Purpose features the voice of Josh Gad as Bailey… and Ellie… and Tino… and Buddy. Oh wait, there was that dog in the beginning that never got a name that was euthanized after being captured by a dog catcher and taken to the pound. He was the voice of that one, too. Yup! Lots of doggie deaths. It’s like someone thought they could garnish the same response as Old Yeller and Marley & Me by increasing quantity and sacrificing quality.

The audience gets to join Dog With No Name/Bailey/Ellie/Tino/Buddy as he (she) is reincarnated multiple times as a different dog after each emotion-tugging death. Gad is our narrator and shares what the dog is thinking. (Hint: It’s frequently food and, oddly enough, most frequently pretzels.) Through this thought process, we can gather the person who wrote this movie loves dogs but doesn’t give them too much credit in the brains department. Instinctually, the dogs are on another level though as these shallow thinkers know how to do everything from escape locked garages, defecate with excellent timing and chase their tail whenever a human needs to smile to swim, rescue humans in distress and fetch.

Do I sound unimpressed by A Dog’s Purpose? Well, there’s good reason for that. (Hint: I was unimpressed.) If anything, the multiple deaths of our main character water down the emotions. It would be like getting upset Mario was squashed by a flying turtle shell in Super Mario Brothers. You know he’s coming back so what’s all the fuss about? If anything, this movie for dog lovers implies there’s no reason to fret because your family pet is coming back in another life and, if you’re really lucky, he or she might come back to you. Ugh!

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • The Dogs Are Cute
    That’s what you want, right? If that’s enough, go see A Dog’s Purpose.

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • Ridiculous Subplots
    The storylines that develop in the background of this canine lovefest are hard to buy. It’s hard to blame the writer(s) since I’m pretty sure they were stuck with whatever the book this was based on chose to write about and were probably pretty confident the audience would be emotionally melting away at the sight of so many dogs they wouldn’t care anyway.
  • A Team of Writers Is Never A Good Thing
    It took 5 writers to bring A Dog’s Purpose to life. The collective group was previously responsible for George of the Jungle, Muffin Top: A Love Story, the sequel to Diary of a Wimpy Kid (who knew there was a sequel?) and The Rocker. Yikes!
  • Alleged Abuse
    Right before the film’s release, a slickly edited video surfaced alleging animal abuse on the set of A Dog’s Purpose. As all sides have weighed in (except for the dog because, well, dogs can’t talk) and PETA has requested people boycott the film, the filmmakers made it easier for people to avoid by making a film that isn’t very good in the first place.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2017-01-30
By: Brian Joseph
On: January 30, 2017
In: 2017, Hot Take
Previous Post: Hot Take: Gold
Next Post: Hot Take: xXx: Return of Xander Cage

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.