Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: Molly’s Game

Hot Take: Another great showcase for Jessica Chastain… even if they might have started resembling each other.

Last year, Jessica Chastain starred in Miss Sloane. Personally, I thought she should have been nominated for her performance but didn’t think it was going to happen because the film wasn’t critically acclaimed. She carried that film and elevated it from good to very good (almost great) status with her performance alone. At the time, John Madden’s Miss Sloane was occasionally referred to as “Sorkin-esque” albeit written by Jonathan Perera and directed by John Madden. So, this year’s Chastain entry to Awards season feels a lot like last year’s entry as Chastain carries much of the film as the titular character in Molly’s Game (although she gets more help from supporting cast member Idris Elba than anyone who appeared in Miss Sloane) and this year’s movie is actually written and directed (in his directorial debut) by Aaron Sorkin. 

Based on the true story of Molly Bloom (whom Chastain portrays in the film), Molly’s Game takes us into the world of underground poker rooms in Los Angeles and then New York featuring high profile actors, athletes, business titans and eventually, Russian mobsters. Molly was an Olympic athlete from a family of successful siblings (her one brother Jeremy was a World Champion skier and played football for the Philadelphia Eagles and her other brother Jordan is a Harvard surgeon) and a father (Kevin Costner) who pushed her hard. The film starts out with her arrest by 17 FBI agents with rifles and shotguns in the middle of the night for running a high stakes underground poker game. Broke and desperate but wanting to fight to clear her name, Bloom goes to see lawyers to pick up her case. She finally convinces Charlie Jaffey (Idris Elba) to take her on as a client despite the fact she has no money and was being buried in the tabloids.

Essentially, if you saw Miss Sloane last year, you get more of the same from Chastain this year. That’s not a bad thing in the least as she shreds whatever role is put in front of her. (Molly was an Olympic skier, shred is positive here… okay, maybe it’s not the best reference in the world. Whatever.) The Sorkin effect on the film is evident, too. If you were to watch Miss Sloane and Molly’s Game side by side, you’d be able to tell the genuine article over the knock-off as Molly’s Game is crisper, has better dialogue and that signature pulse that Sorkin’s words seem to find. Sorkin’s novice skills as a director do also shine through as he feels like he’s trying to emulate some of the better contemporary directors (tell me you don’t see a little Oliver Stone) rather than establish his own identity. The film also stumbles in the third act but still feels like a brisk 2 hour and 20 minutes and recovers when sticking the landing thanks to a scene stealing Sorkin-crafted speech from Elba that delivers the cherry on top of the sundae as the film reaches its climax. 

If you’re a fan of Chastain, Elba or Sorkin, this film should be on your radar. Sorkin’s typical manipulation of the truth (see The Social Network, Moneyball or Steve Jobs) isn’t as evident here. In fact checking the film’s events, this is closer to the truth than any Sorkin film to previously hit the big screen. Chastain, again, should be considered for an Academy Award nomination but will likely not make the cut. Elba could also get some consideration for supporting actor and Sorkin is always in the running for a Screenplay nod. The film itself isn’t Best Picture material but there’s enough going for it to make it worthy of a look see.

Why Watch?

Chastain… But not just Chastain this time. She gets a lot of support from co-star Elba and writer/director Sorkin to elevate this film.

Why Skip?

It feels an awful lot like Miss Sloane and you’re not a fan of deja vu. (Not the Denzel Washington film, either.)

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2018-01-15
By: Brian Joseph
On: January 15, 2018
In: 2017, Hot Take
Previous Post: Hot Take: Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle
Next Post: Hot Take: The Shape of Water

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.