Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: Everest

Hot Take: Visually, Everest is a stunner. (IMAX 3D… WOW!) The story itself mirrors the mountain. It takes a long time to get there, it’s painful at times and it is overloaded with characters to the point where many get lost in the shuffle. The payoff, in the end, is solid but there’s a lingering question of was it worth it?

From the moment the movie starts, Everest‘s visuals smack you in the face. It’s reminiscent of a documentary filmed specifically for an IMAX experience. Throughout, the movie relies heavily on the stunning visuals to immerse the audience into Everest rather than the deep, talented cast it has access to.

Here’s the challenge Everest has: How do you tell a tale about a group of mountain climbers where any of a handful of characters could take the lead but no one is truly compelling enough to make it necessary for them to become the focus?

It’s the opposite of Black Mass where, although it is obvious the main character is James “Whitey” Bulger, you’re intrigued by the supporting cast. In Everest, you have Rob Hall (Jason Clarke), the head of Adventure Consultants, one of the many groups capitalizing on the lucrative guided climbing expedition market in 1996. The group of amateurs he’s leading includes Doug Hansen (John Hawkes), a sometimes mailman who has already failed making it to the top of the mountain once. There’s Beck Weathers (Josh Brolin), a rich Texas adventure junkie who says he didn’t even tell his wife he was going to Everest because she said he’d divorce him. There’s Yasuko Namba (Naoko Mori), a 47-year-old Japanese woman who has reached the highest summit in six of seven continents with Everest being the last to accomplish. There’s Scott Fischer (Jake Gyllenhaal), Hall’s friendly rival who leads his own expedition. Notice how oversized this paragraph is getting? There’s been no mention of Hall’s pregnant wife, Jan (Keira Knightley). Helen Wilton (Emily Watson), the base camp coordinator. Andy “Harold” Harris (Martin Henderson), Hall’s right hand man. Peach Weathers (Robin Wright), Beck’s wife. Jon Krakauer (Michael Kelly), the magazine writer along for the climb and the story. Anatoli Boukreev (Ingvar E. Sigurdsson), the climber who don’t need no stinking oxygen. Dorjee (Ang Phula Sherpa) and Lopsang (Pemba Sherpa), the Sherpas who lead the way behind the scenes to make the dangerous trek as safe as possible for the climbers. Am I leaving anyone out?

But that’s the challenge of Everest. The challenge Everest fails to accomplish, sort of. With so many characters, the film acts as a cinematic memorial rather than focusing on telling a great story. This thrusts the mountain into the spotlight and while Mount Everest is cold, terrifying, dangerous, daunting, majestic and humbling, it’s also immovable. There’s no catharsis for your main character when it’s a massive mountain standing 29,029 feet tall.

Even with it’s storytelling flaws, it’s likely you’ll attach to someone in the movie. For me, it was the family and friends of those climbing the mountain, especially the wives of Hall and Weathers. By the time Everest summits, it’s likely to tug at your emotions more than you’d expect. At least that was my experience.

Going in to Everest, my initial thought was “Why the hell would someone want to climb Mount Everest?” In the end, I was left thinking this question is rhetorical.

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • Visually Worthy of the IMAX Upcharge
    If you have the option to see Everest in IMAX, it’s worth the extra money.
  • It’s Immersive
    While some will criticize the pacing, it’s important to remember the film covers 40 days and tells the story of a climb to the highest mountain on the planet… it would do a disservice to the subject matter if it was rushed.
  • The Performances Are About As Much As You Could Ask For
    All things considered, the cast is invested and deliver strong performances. Outside of cinematography, it would be unsurprising to see Everest shut out of the Oscars but it’s not due to effort or execution from the acting side of things.

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • There’s Little Effort to Answer Why
    What’s the motivation for attempting to climb a 29,029 foot mountain? Especially when the journey frequently has a fatal ending. There’s little satisfaction provided here. Basically, because it’s there is the most satisfying response.
  • Respect Gets In The Way
    The story has an underbelly the director never gets into. Watching Everest, there’s an obvious respect for what the climbers are doing and who the climbers are but, because of that, the movie never digs into some of the grittier issues.
  • So Overcrowded!
    As previously mentioned, you’ll probably get attached to at least one of the characters. However, there’s a chance the character you get attached to might disappear with little explanation.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2015-09-23
By: Brian Joseph
On: September 23, 2015
In: 2015, Hot Take
Previous Post: Trailer Hot Take: The Angry Birds
Next Post: Hot Take: Grandma

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.