Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: Steve Jobs

Movie Hot Take: If you’re after fan fiction based on a cultural icon stressing the message, “It’s okay to be an asshole as long as you’re creative because even the people you crap on the most will still hang around to see your genius” then Steve Jobs is the movie for you.

It’s hard to characterize Steve Jobs. It can’t really be called a biopic since very little of it is actually true. The characters are based on real people. Events in the background of the movie’s drama happened. There’s a company called Apple. However, none of the critical scenes of the film actually happened. No, the critical scenes weren’t embellished or given a twist from their real-life counterparts… they actually didn’t happen!

Steve Jobs might be compelling at moments. It has some well written scenes that strike a nerve. The heaviness of the dialogue is relieved by the lightning-fast way it’s packaged. Oh, and it’s basically bullshit.

In an attempt to capture the personality of Jobs, Aaron Sorkin’s script presents fictional accounts of three product launches (1984’s Macintosh by Apple, 1988’s Black Cube by NeXT and 1998’s iMac by Apple) where Jobs treats those around him like complete garbage, they get exasperated for a second or two and eventually they remember Jobs is a mega-rich (also exaggerated in the film) super smart genius of a man and they forgive him through a few non-verbal indications.

Basically, Sorkin’s script reinvents the past of the man who is often credited with reinventing the future. Steve Jobs takes more liberties than Jem and the Holograms did bringing the ’80s cartoon to life. Before viewing the film, I had no knowledge of the events presented in the film. While viewing, I frequently found myself entertained by the battle of words Jobs had with the people around him but also had this feeling of disbelief toward what I was seeing. Immediately after the film, a little research confirmed, the events as presented were actually “inspired by true events” to the point where it would be disingenuous to call the film a biopic. It’s a biopic in the way Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter is a biopic. 

The film takes the life of a fascinating man and presents things that actually didn’t happen at highly publicized events. It’s hard to imagine why as there’s plenty about Jobs that lends itself to the big screen. The best hypothetical comparison I can come up with is if when making a biopic about Lincoln, the screenwriter presents the Gettysburg Address by having Lincoln proclaim, “I like big butts and I cannot lie. No other brother can deny. When a girl walks past with an itty bitty waist and a round thing in your face, you get sprung” instead of “Four score and seven years ago…”

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • iExcite
    The film does a great job of creating the excitement around product launches.
  • iEntertain
    Despite the fact nothing you are viewing is actually how it happened, it presents facts through an entertaining twisted reality. There were product launches and things happened behind the scenes but Sorkin thought it better to alter reality and present other events from Jobs’ life through these hypothetical moments. It is entertaining even if it isn’t real.

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • iBullshit
    Very little of what happened behind the scenes at the product launches in Steve Jobs actually happened in reality. It’s hard to compute why the film is getting so much Oscar buzz.
  • iArgue
    If the thought of six people arguing with Jobs three different times over the course of a decade and a half sounds entertaining, this is your movie!
  • iNsufferable
    Most seem to laud the way Sorkin chooses to ignore the facts when presenting his perception of Jobs’ personae. More than one review referred to the take as refreshing while acknowledging the film’s decision to throw actuality out the window. One man’s refreshing is another man’s insufferable.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2015-10-25
By: Brian Joseph
On: October 25, 2015
In: 2015, Hot Take
Previous Post: Hot Take: Jem and the Holograms
Next Post: Hot Take: Rock the Kasbah

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.