Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: Victor Frankenstein

Hot Take: At some point early on, I was hooked on Victor Frankenstein. Then, about half way through, I realized how bad of an idea this really was. Then, no matter what I did, it wouldn’t stop. It’s funny how life can imitate art sometimes.

The opening act of Victor Frankenstein — the origin story of how Victor and Igor met as imagined by screenwriter Max Landis — gives the film unexpected promise. “Maybe,” you think, “this is a story worth the twist.” As the film progresses, the plot unravels, hopes diminish and the movie, much like the monster’s head, flattens.

There’s mad genius in the retelling of Victor Frankenstein but, unfortunately, the genius is fleeting and the high points are few and far between. Despite excellent acting by James McAvoy (as Victor) and Daniel Radcliffe (as Igor), it’s hard not to see a little bit of young Charles Xavier in McAvoy’s portrayal and a sprinkle of Harry Potter in Radcliffe’s performance. The London setting doesn’t help either. By the end, you’re just waiting for someone to shout, “Expecto patronum!”

Unfortunately, despite its strong start, Victor Frankenstein struggles to the finish. By the middle of the third act, you’ll probably be ready for this tiresome tale to end.

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • The Chemistry of McAvoy and Radcliffe
    The pair work together well and their camaraderie is obvious. It gives a genuine feel to the relationship of Victor and Igor.
  • The Opening Act
    If somehow the film captured the imagination through it’s entirety as it does in the first 20-30 minutes, we’d have a winning formula. Disappointingly, the rest of the movie made lazy decisions and basically harvested parts from other films we’ve already seen before.

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • Been There, Done That
    While Victor Frankenstein diverts from the path of the original idea, it chooses to repeat ideas already repeated dozens of times in other films. It’s basically a copy of a copy of a copy and anyone who has ever spent time around a Xerox machine knows that’s going to greatly reduce the quality of the final product.
  • Ummmmm…
    So, Victor Frankenstein isn’t about Frankenstein’s monster like other Frankenstein films but it really isn’t about Victor, either? It’s kind of more about Igor? Huh?
  • Did We Really Need the Sequel Tease?
    Note to Hollywood: Stop writing movies with a sequel in mind.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2015-12-02
By: Brian Joseph
On: December 2, 2015
In: 2015, Hot Take
Previous Post: Hot Take: Trumbo
Next Post: Trailer Hot Take: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.