Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: 13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers Of Benghazi

Hot Take: For what it is, it’s a good (not great) movie. It’s easily identifiable as a Michael Bay film (the slow motion, the cheesy dialogue, the blowin’ stuff up real good, the complete and utter lack of an editor — even the title this time!) which is some good and some bad. Overall, it’s a good movie that suffers from a bloated first half and a second half that some will chalk up as combat porn.

My expectation meter typically sits in the middle to low range on movies released in January and even lower when the movie has a Michael Bay attachment. Enter 13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers Of Benghazi. The movie is so desperate to present itself as historically accurate, it wears a name more fitting for a documentary. Based on a book — “13 Hours: The Inside Account of What Really Happened In Benghazi” — which is the retelling of the Benghazi ordeal as told by the five surviving CIA security contractors who are the central characters in the movie, it is fairly accurate. It also makes every effort to not be political. It makes no bones about pointing out governmental ineptitude but it doesn’t point fingers or name names. So, it’s sort of not political (like an unlit M-80 isn’t an explosive).

There’s plenty of intensity and drama in the movie. It’s often dragged out with Bay’s questionable directorial choices and obvious “go green” policy regarding wasting film as it seems Bay rarely, if ever, has anything edited from him movies. I guess there’s a possibility of a 3-4 hour version of 13 Hours somewhere but, at 144 minutes, it overstays it’s welcome.

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • The Action Scenes
    The sights and sounds of war are presented with great detail here by Bay. When combat ensues, Bay is at his best and delivers some compelling action and a presentation of the battle that captures the difficulty the CIA security contractors in doing what they were hired to do.
  • Escaping Jim from The Office
    John Krasinski’s character from the long running hit NBC show is iconic… and impossible to imagine as gun for hire sent to the Middle East to defend the ideals of ‘merica. In order to prepare for his role as “Jack”, Krasinski trained with the same person who trained Bradley Cooper for American Sniper. Early on in the film, Krasinski is seen shirtless and ripped and with one quick visual, Bay wipes away all memories of Jim. It might be Bay’s crowning achievement outside of that bombing scene in Pearl Harbor (unless you consider committing unspeakable horrible acts upon my childhood a crowning achievement).

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • Those Michael Bay Fingerprints
    You’ll see them, everywhere. If you’re a Bay fan, you’ll love it. If not, it’s a little distracting. If you’re unsure of where I fall, I was a little distracted. Oh, and there’s nothing bad about an editor, Mr. Bay. Try it one time.
  • Don’t Let Anyone Kid You, This Movie Is Political
    Somehow this movie will work it’s way into the next election. The biggest black mark on Hillary Clinton’s political career is Benghazi. If you believe this movie isn’t political, did Donald Trump rent out a theater in Iowa for a showing of 13 Hours and give away tickets because he wanted to entertain his backers? Um… OK.
  • It’s Manipulative Without Any Real Character Development
    As previously mentioned, even the title is a ploy to sell the authenticity of the movie. Instead of any real character development, 13 Hours relies on devoting a considerable amount of time having the five contractors talk to their loved ones back home and trite exchanges between the contractors themselves. Other than that, we don’t really get to know the characters.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2016-01-16
By: Brian Joseph
On: January 16, 2016
In: 2016, Hot Take
Previous Post: Trailer Hot Take: Money Monster
Next Post: Hot Take: Norm of the North

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.