Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: How to Be Single

Hot Take: You’re allowed to enjoy a movie that isn’t necessarily good.

There’s something about How to Be Single that’s enjoyable to watch. It is way too long, it gives a very poor depiction of New York City and it tries to tell too many stories at once (there are roughly 6 different storylines the film tries to wrap up in the end) but it’s very watchable and occasionally it makes a good point.

What’s weird about How to Be Single is how, on one hand, it can be very formulaic (not that we’ve ever seen anyone try to tell a tale of four women trying to survive relationship-wise, especially not in New York City) and, on the other hand, somewhat unconventional (people actually do have disease-free sex without pregnancy from time to time, even if it is casual and involves alcohol).

Another oddity is the way the cast is utilized. Dakota Johnson, particularly lifeless in Fifty Shades of Grey, is surprisingly, awkwardly charming in the main role of Alice. Rebel Wilson and Leslie Mann, the two most established and defined actresses in the movie, are basically the character they’ve played best in any of their other movies. Wilson has carried over Fat Amy to How to Be Single and Mann’s signature character eventually appears from beneath some workaholic doctor scrubs. The most talented actress of the bunch, Alison Brie, is completely wasted in the one rom-com stereotype the film felt compelled to play by the book.

By film’s end, I was as miffed as I was titillated. How to Be Single could have been better but it wasn’t nearly as bad as I thought it would be.

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • New York City
    There’s nothing better than New York as the backdrop to a movie. It’s not that How to Be Single gets anything right (there’s no way some of these characters could afford their lifestyle based on the information we’re presented, it’s not that easy to get around and find me a bar that spaced out with such quality lighting and I’ll buy you a drink) but the city is sexy on film especially caked in this much cover up.
  • There’s Something About Dakota
    I walked into How to Be Single sure of one thing — I’m going to hate Dakota Johnson’s performance. I didn’t. I actually enjoyed it. It’s Zac Efron all over again, isn’t it?

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • Rebel Wilson
    Funny in the trailers for the film. It turns out 90% of her scenes are, well, in the trailers! Here’s hoping somewhere in the future Wilson gets a chance to have a little bit of range in her roles.
  • Unconventionally Cliché
    It feels like How to Be Single spends a lot of time trying to prove itself and go out of it’s way to pretend it is different. It wants to be unconventional but never can quite escape the cliché of it all. At one point, the film makes a few snide jokes about Sex & The City and then continues to be a younger cousin, right down to the main character’s narration.
  • #HowToBeSingleSoWhite
    Is it really that hard to create quality roles for black women? Alison Brie’s character didn’t even interact with the other three women in the film… she didn’t even have to be friends with the other characters. There is a black male in the movie though (Marlon Wayans Jr.). He’s a rich, single parent raising his daughter on his own because his wife passed away.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2016-02-13
By: Brian Joseph
On: February 13, 2016
In: 2016, Hot Take
Previous Post: Hot Take: Where to Invade Next
Next Post: Hot Take: Deadpool

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.