Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: A Hologram for the King

Hot Take: Good characters. Boring movie. Unearned romance.

It’s hard to put into words the experience of watching A Hologram for the King. Some might say Tom Hanks is brilliant because, well, they always say he’s brilliant. He’s that everyman character he usually plays but he is out of place in Saudi Arabia, drinking illegal booze and even having sexual encounters. But that’s the Tom Hanks everyman in wolf’s clothing, all right. It’s a stranger in a strange land tale. Nowhere near the success Lost in Translation was. Nowhere near the disaster of Rock the Kasbah. Actually, the best comparison might be Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, if the lead were male and there was no war.

A Hologram for the King tries to accomplish a lot thematically. There are so many subplots in the film but none of them carry much weight to really earn your investment. Hanks plays Alan Clay, a salesman on a business trip to Saudi Arabia to sell the King on a new communication technology. Overall, this plot gets very little attention. Instead, the movie is also a buddy comedy as Hanks’ Clay befriends Yousef (Alexander Black) who he meets when he overslept on his first day in Saudi Arabia and needs a ride to visit his potential client. There’s a glance at Clay’s relationship with his daughter through letters and a few flashbacks. There’s Clay and his coping with being isolated in a foreign country while growing concerned with a lump on his back. Let’s not forget about the Danish woman (Sidse Babett Knudsen) he meets who is obviously interested in him. Oh, and that female doctor (Sarita Choudhury), Alan is obviously smitten with without much explanation as to why. Wait, did I mention that Hanks’ character was there to sell a technology to the Saudis? Oh, I did?

You’d think with all of these subplots and a meager 97 minute run time, the movie would fly by. Unfortunately, the story meanders on it’s way to an unearned but predictable conclusion. There is nothing particularly wrong with the film as it’s well acted and visually adequate but there is a total lack of excitement as Hanks wears the same expression on his face for most of the 97 minute affair.

The most troubling part of the film has to be the budding romance between Clay and Zahra, the doctor he meets while having the lump on his back examined. In an effort to avoid spoilers, the way the love story between the two evolves isn’t really difficult to buy into but it doesn’t make for a great story.

A Hologram for the King is a mediocre effort backed by a typical Hanks performance. He does the everyman well but there really is nothing groundbreaking here. It’s a middle-aged white guy in Saudi Arabia lost in a mid-life crisis, looking to find his way. Don’t expect to care.

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • The Power of Hanks is a Curious Thing
    While watching Hanks in A Hologram for the King, it was hard to differentiate his performance here from some of his others. Usually, that’s a problem and it should be. However, there’s something about Hanks that makes his performance feel new and fresh even though we’ve seen him in this type of role before.
  • The Buddy Comedy
    Although it’s another case of whitewashing, Black’s Yousef is very funny alongside Hanks’ Clay. The newcomer gives the film some much needed comic relief and it’s disappointing to see their time together on-screen dissipate into nothing in the third act.
  • The Desert Visuals
    The vast desert landscape is visually appealing and the scenes that take place where the new city is being constructed in the middle of the desert provide eye-pleasing visuals.

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • The Romance
    Hanks’ salesman and Choudhury’s doctor falling for each other doesn’t feel genuine. Early in the film when it is hinted at and shrugged off by Clay, it is posed as a great risk for Zahra to entertain such a thought in her country. Nothing ever happens to sell you on the idea that a relationship with Clay is worth taking such a risk.
  • Too Many Loose Ends
    Have you ever owned a pair of shoes that just won’t stay tied to the point where when they come untied you don’t even bother anymore? Then, you spend the rest of the day politely thanking people who remind you that your shoe is untied? A Hologram for the King feels a lot like that.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2016-04-23
By: Brian Joseph
On: April 23, 2016
In: 2016, Hot Take
Previous Post: To See or Not to See – April 22nd: The Huntsman: Winter’s War, A Hologram for the King, Elvis & Nixon, Compadres, The Meddler & Tale of Tales
Next Post: Hot Take: The Huntsman: Winter’s War

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.