Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: The Man Who Knew Infinity

Hot Take: Why would you make a biopic about a self-taught mathematical genius whose work is considered inspired, imagined and original by the numbers?

The true story of Srinivasa Ramanujan (Dev Patel), a poor Indian man who happens to be a self-taught mathematical genius, and his relationship with G.H. Hardy (Jeremy Irons) is interesting. It’s easy to see why someone thought this tale deserved it’s moment on the big screen. The Man Who Knew Infinity attempts to give the story it’s moment and does an adequate job of telling the story but lacks the imagination and originality spoken of regarding Ramanujan’s work. Instead, the tale is a measured, dutiful, paint by numbers biopic that informs but not much else.

In 1913, when Ramanujan and Hardy meet, Indians are looked upon as lesser than equal to the English. Hardy and his mathematician cohorts at Trinity College are skeptical of Ramanujan’s mathematical theories because of his background. Hardy and his closest confidant Littlewood (Toby Jones) are the only two — at first — who believe Ramanujan may be a genius. As the story progresses, we witness the challenges Ramanujan has in England. He battles prejudice and hatred and grows ill at some point during his stay. The socially inept Hardy fails to warm to the prodigy and the relationship is strained as Hardy pushes Ramanujan to help Hardy prove his work and disprove the doubting mathematical world at Trinity wrong.

There are a number of things that work here as Irons and Patel both deliver strong performances. Jones also has a couple of delightful moments on screen. Devika Bhise who plays Janaki, the wife Ramanujan leaves behind in India, also does an above average job. Unfortunately, despite a number of good to very good performances, it adds up to a very adequate but average telling of an intriguing story. Throughout the film there are frequent mentions of Ramanujan’s creative, inspirational and original work. The film, however, is more mechanical in it’s telling and lacks the passion and any originality. The Man Who Knew Infinity is adequate and taking such risks could have resulted in a mess but without them, the movie is stuck being average.

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • Irons and Patel
    The pair have good chemistry on screen and the awkward relationship between two geniuses who lack interpersonal polish is very believable throughout.
  • The Story of Ramanujan
    Even without the bells and whistles, Ramanujan’s story is inspirational and moving. His impact on the world of mathematics is bigger than the film expresses. Even though the film doesn’t prove it, you know it’s the case by the time the credits roll.
  • Toby Jones
    Jones’ character Littlejohn is Hardy’s only real friend in the film. Littlejohn adds some of the lighter, more humorous moments but also plays a part in some of the deeper, heavier themes. Jones does a delightful job with the role and holds his own on the screen with Irons which isn’t easy to do with such a heavyweight.

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • The Simple Biopic Equation
    In the last 12 months, I was irritated by Aaron Sorkin’s choices in Steve Jobs and delighted by Don Cheadle’s decisions in Miles Ahead. The two biopics take a road less traveled and while I hated Steve Jobs, The Man Who Knew Infinity gave a new perspective on the way it was told. Ramanujan’s tale could have benefitted from some risk in it’s storytelling. It may have failed but the subject deserved that much.
  • It Didn’t Feel Like 1913 Sometimes
    Watching the film, it never felt like the movie was placed properly in it’s time period. There were plenty of reminders of a less modern time but the authenticity of the portrayal of the early 1900s felt a little off.

 

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2016-05-19
By: Brian Joseph
On: May 19, 2016
In: 2016, Hot Take
Previous Post: 10 Mobile Apps That Shouldn’t Get A Movie (But You Never Know!)
Next Post: Trailer Hot Take: Nerve

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.