Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: Central Intelligence

Hot Take: I guess you need more than a little Hart and a big Johnson, after all. A funnier script might have helped.

Potential. Central Intelligence had a ton of it. Dwayne Johnson is a bonafide star and has proven he can carry action movies with both might and charm and has also had a few glimpses of a comedic presence. Kevin Hart is one of the funniest stand-up comedians going and typically delivers a funny performance even when the movie isn’t all that good. (See, well, almost anything Hart has done.) So, pairing the two in a buddy comedy seems like a can’t miss. Throw in an excellent trailer and some great pre-movie appearances by the duo and Central Intelligence was primed to be the comedy hit of the summer. Unfortunately, there was something missing: Comedy.

For what it’s worth, Central Intelligence isn’t terrible. Both Johnson and Hart have an on-screen presence that makes you smile even if it isn’t doubling you over. The movie offers nothing new in terms of plot twists. If I handed you action figures of the actors in the movie, you and your friends would likely produce a comparable flick. (Right down to the moment when Aaron Paul says “Bitch!”)

For the most part, Johnson and Hart have great chemistry. Actually, the chemistry might be too good as there are times in the film where the two aren’t supposed to be enjoying each other’s company as much as they seem to be. It gives a lot of hope for the inevitable Central Intelligence 2 which we should expect to hit theaters in 2018 or 2019. (This is pure speculation on my part but come on! Every movie gets a sequel these days.)

The biggest fault the movie has is how formulaic it is. There doesn’t seem to be an original idea in the entire 114 minutes the film is on screen. Outside of the low hanging fruit picked by the writers to make us laugh, the action sequences are so cliché, it’s hard to really give them much thought. How many times are we going to watch action sequences where the bad guys can’t shoot and car chases take place on empty city streets? In a day and age where we can’t sneeze without someone putting it on YouTube or Snapchat, you’d think the writers and directors would be acutely aware of those mediums. Hell, there are bad Facebook and Snapchat jokes in the movie. The writers know these things exist.

Central Intelligence ends up being a below average movie that relies heavily on it’s star power. Fortunately, Johnson and Hart are big enough to carry the movie but they can only carry it so far. With the lack of help, the dynamic duo receive, Central Intelligence becomes just another summer fling you’ll likely forget.

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • Johnson and Hart
    The pair work well together and it would be unsurprising to see them team up again. Let’s hope it’s for something other than Central Intelligence 2 but in all likelihood, that’s the most probable outcome.
  • The Rock’s Wardrobe
    As Bob Stone, Johnson sports a yellow Public Enemy T-shirt and a unicorn shirt. As someone who frequently walks around town in a Pikachu shirt, I totally support this fashion trend.

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • Uninspired Supporting Cast & Cameos
    While the casting of Amy Ryan and Aaron Paul are actually good casting decisions, their talents are underutilized. Why does Jason Bateman have to be an asshole in every movie he’s in? Is that all he’s capable of? And that last cameo… well, it’s predictable but I won’t spoil it since it’s uncredited.
  • Piss-Poor Action
    At what point will we raise the effort put into action scenes in these types of movies? I don’t think the writers or director think we’re going to buy that the bad guys can’t shoot and the city streets are conveniently empty… I don’t think they care.

 

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2016-06-18
By: Brian Joseph
On: June 18, 2016
In: 2016, Hot Take
Previous Post: Hot Take: 400 Days
Next Post: Hot Take: Finding Dory

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.