Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: The Conjuring 2

Hot Take: The Enfield Poltergeist gets a Hollywood ending. Yay! (That’s sarcasm.)

There’s something manipulative about using the words “based on a true story” especially in horror movies. It immediately increases the stakes and adds a bit of fear. The worst thing you could possibly do before seeing The Conjuring 2 is read History vs. Hollywood’s comparison of the real-life story to the shiny penny Hollywood came up with.

To be fair, the most important job a movie has to execute is to entertain the audience. In this case, The Conjuring 2 falls short, too. From the time The Conjuring 2 begins, doubt of it’s authenticity sets in. The feeling never goes away. If anything, doubt is an overriding presence that prevents you from getting fully engrossed in the film, attached to the characters and bought in to the apparent nightmare the Hodgson family is experiencing. Outside of a handful of jump scares masterfully crafted by director James Wan and the inherent creepiness of demonic children (a horror muscle flexed too frequently), The Conjuring 2 is hard to take at face value and you spend a lot of time thinking about the possibility the whole thing is a hoax to actually be frightened by the events as they unfold.

While similar was done with The Conjuring, it feels like The Conjuring 2 doubles down on the embellishments and puts the Warrens (played by Vera Farmiga and Patrick Wilson) on an even bigger pedestal. If you are a fan of the spirit fighting couple from the first film, you’ll probably find the sequel to be amiable. Otherwise, The Conjuring 2 is a tougher sell. That being said, in 2016, only The Witch has a more compelling and scarier premise. It’s been a rough year for horror films and, for lack of better choices, The Conjuring 2 at least has a moderate amount of scares and a somewhat coherent storyline that holds up despite it’s obvious embellishments on the facts around the true story of the Enfield Poltergeist.

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • Visually Creepy
    Director James Wan is very good at putting together a frightful experience visually. There are plenty of images in The Conjuring 2 that stick with you long after the credits roll.
  • Madison Wolfe
    Wolfe plays Janet Hodgson, the paranormally tormented young girl who is terrorized by spirits and demonically possessed by the spiritual presence. Wolfe is convincing in her role and adds to the uneasy mood.

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • Sometimes Not Letting the Facts Get In the Way Doesn’t Automatically Make It A Good Story
    If The Conjuring 2 were a work of pure fiction, it might work better. Heck, even films like The Blair Witch Project have gotten away with ignoring the fact that it was fiction to amp up the stakes. However, The Conjuring 2 sells itself heavily on it’s story being real. The film embraces the reality of the Enfield incident and hurts it’s own credibility in the process.
  • Those Pesky Gaping Plot Holes
    To accompany the bending of the truth that goes on in the movie, some massive plot holes develop. The biggest being why a demon hellbent on terrorizing a family in England would also provoke the world’s most well known paranormal investigators despite the two being seemingly unconnected at the time. Is there only one demon spiritĀ in the world?

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2016-06-13
By: Brian Joseph
On: June 13, 2016
In: 2016, Hot Take
Previous Post: Hot Take: Now You See Me 2
Next Post: BuRStS #19: Hello My Name Is Doris, 10 Cloverfield Lane, 45 Years, The Dooms Chapel Horror, Eddie the Eagle, Get a Job, London Has Fallen, Quackerz, The Young Messiah

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.