Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: The Lobster

Hot Take: Unique. Maybe too unique. (Is that possible?) If you polled the audience afterward, 80% of them got it and 90% of those people are lying. Welcome to the king of art house porn for 2016.

I didn’t hate The Lobster. I didn’t love The Lobster, either. Honestly, I didn’t know what to make of the film. It’s been about two days and I still don’t really know what to make of it. It’s funny to read through the reviews of the film and see how many different takes there are. Even funnier is how they are confidentially presented as fact. Unless you wrote it or spoke directly to the person who wrote it and he told you exactly what he meant, I’m calling bullshit. You can think you know what you just watched but with The Lobster, you don’t really know.

The movie goes off on a number of tangents. For some reason, it is often most referred to as a dark comedy. It’s plenty dark and while there are moments of humor, even those moments are a little unsettling. If anything, The Lobster is a horror movie. I think. Seriously, it’s okay to not fully grasp what you just watched even if you’re a reviewer. Actually, it humanizes you as a writer and makes you seem a little less pretentious and cocksure. Maybe the reviewers are embodying what they just watched as The Lobster is extremely pretentious.

So, here’s the plot. In the near future, single people from The City are sent to The Hotel where they have 45 days to find a mate. If they do not find a mate in 45 days, they are turned into an animal of their choice. During their stay, between mingling with the other singles, they are sent to The Woods to hunt The Loners who have escaped The Hotel. At least I assume they’ve escaped The Hotel. If during the hunt, a single person is able to hit one of the loners with a tranquilizer dart and capture them, they will earn an additional day in The Hotel. If they find a mate, they are transferred to The Yacht. What happens after that? Who knows!

The Lobster follows David (Colin Farrell) who is the newest guest in The Hotel. With his brother as his companion (who is now a dog because, well, he didn’t make it when he stayed at The Hotel), David has 45 days to find a mate. We meet a number of characters during the stay. None of the women have names. Oddly enough, the men do: Robert (John C. Reilly) has a lisp and John (Ben Whishaw) has a limp. David is short sighted and wears glasses. While the film could easily be over in about 20 minutes if all of the guests of The Hotel decided to just have relationships to avoid becoming animals that would make for a rather boring movie. Instead, desperation sets in and David finds a way to connect with one of the guests before ultimately deciding to escape and join The Loners.

Life with The Loners isn’t easy either. There’s more rules to follow and romantic relationships are forbidden. If anyone is caught violating the rules, sadistic punishments are doled out. (Unless you think something called “the red kiss” or “the red intercourse” might be a slap on the wrists.) Of course, here David finds his match and now must figure out how to escape with his love: The Short Sighted Woman (Rachel Weisz).

Honestly, there’s a lot going on in The Lobster and almost too much to process in one viewing. It’s a think piece which comes out at a peculiar time of year. Summer isn’t really known for it’s think pieces. The Lobster feels a little out of place on the cinematic slate. The ads undersell it’s bizarre nature. The film is weird. Really fucking weird. There’s no other way to describe it.

It can’t be stressed enough how dark this film is. The performances from Farrell and Weisz are cold. The entire cast is cold. There’s very little emotion to be found in the performances which amps up the stakes of the film. There are emotional outbursts which are magnified by the lack of emotion the rest of the film shows. The Lobster has very little respect for dating, relationships or loneliness. It’s almost as if it’s saying life sucks then you die. Or, possibly, turn into an animal. There is no middle ground though. I think that’s a detail lost here. It’s sardonic wit mocks all aspects of social relationships. There is no light at the end of the tunnel. We’re all doomed. Or maybe I need to watch it again?

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • Innately Unique
    There are very few direct comparisons to The Lobster. As far as viewing experiences go, David Lynch comes to mind. Gregg Araki is another filmmaker that rings through. I’m unfamiliar with the work of director Yorgos Lanthimos but if the rest of his films are like this, I’m going to stay away for a while as I need time to decompress.
  • The Loner Leader
    Lea Seydoux plays the Loner Leader to perfection. It’s a standout performance and while Farrell and Weisz carry the film, it’s performances like Seydoux’s that mold it into a film that is well rounded on the acting side of things.

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • There Are Some Truly Horrific Scenes
    It’s rare I see a film that I want to edit in my own mind. There is a particularly difficult scene to watch in the film. It’s probably the most difficult scene I’ve watched in a while. There are a few other moments in the movie that stand out as more horror than any other film I’ve seen this year that would actually be classified as horror.
  • It’s A Little Too Dark
    I’ll be the first to admit I might not have understood The Lobster. However, in my estimation the movie seems to have us pegged as what kind of animal we’d be. We’re all sheep!

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2016-06-11
By: Brian Joseph
On: June 11, 2016
In: 2016, Hot Take
Previous Post: Hot Take: The Confirmation
Next Post: Hot Take: Now You See Me 2

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.