Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: Swiss Army Man

Hot Take: What. The. Hell? (And why was it actually pretty awesome?)

Within minutes of the viewing experience that is Swiss Army Man, you’re well aware that you’re in for something completely different. How different? Well, flatulence, masturbation, drinking the spit of a corpse who, oh by the way, talks and feces all play a major role in the storytelling. And that’s the best I can do without any major spoilers.

Swiss Army Man is weird. Really weird. Really fucking weird. That’s okay though. Actually, it’s really okay. Honestly, it’s the best part of the film. Directors Daniels (as they’re affectionately known) disarms you with a tale that in no way, shape or form is sensible yet it feels impossible not to get caught up in the story and the underlying themes of loneliness and obsession amongst others. It’s both ridiculous and substantial. It’s silly and endearing. It’s special, unique and truly one of those times when you can say it is unlike anything you’ve ever seen and this time actually be spot on.

As Hank, a man stuck on a deserted island about to kill himself until a corpse washes up on shore, Paul Dano does weird better than anyone right now and the part is perfectly cast. As the corpse named Manny, Daniel Radcliffe does what we’ve been waiting for him to do. No, not fart for 95 minutes. I mean he does do that, too, but that’s not the point here. Radcliffe overcomes his bigger than life Harry Potter persona and becomes something incomparable. Taking into consideration the level with which Harry Potter has played in his career and the challenge it is to overcome such roles (Imagine Macaulay Culkin as someone other than Kevin from Home Alone, I dare you! Uncle Buck only counts if you remember his character’s name), this is a monumental feat. That isn’t even mentioning the fact that Radcliffe convincingly plays a talking corpse. The two have some of the best chemistry a duo has had in some time in what essentially is a buddy comedy. However, calling it a buddy comedy feels sort of like a slight on the film’s magnitude.

Swiss Army Man delivers a polarizing film that you will either get completely wrapped up in or stay so far disconnected from, you’ll probably ask, “Why are we here?” (Unless you weren’t able to sneak your corpse friend in, then you’ll probably ask, “Why am I here?”) What’s unique about this film is that for those asking, “Why are we here?” who have not connected with the movie, what they don’t realize is the movie is actually asking the same thing.

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • No Rules
    The gloves are off in Swiss Army Man. Thanks to the ridiculous premise of a suicidal man befriending a corpse, the film can go wherever the heck it wants and do whatever it feels like. The Daniels waste absolutely none of these opportunities and deliver something utterly unique.
  • Need Weird? Book ’em, Dano!
    All future roles of peculiarity featuring odd behavior need to go to Paul Dano. No one sells it weird as normal as well as him and he’s one of the more underrated actors of the last decade.
  • Where’s Harry?
    All evidence of Harry Potter is completely gone as Radcliffe plays an inquisitive, flatulent corpse with an uncanny survival instinct. (Where’s Alanis Morissette when you need her?)

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • It’s Not Really A Con But This Isn’t For Everyone
    There is no way Swiss Army Man will be universally loved. It’s out there. Way out there. Some people don’t want to go out there and that’s okay. Makes for a roomier theater.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2016-07-02
By: Brian Joseph
On: July 2, 2016
In: 2016, Hot Take
Previous Post: Hot Take: The BFG
Next Post: Hot Take: Our Kind of Traitor

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.