Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: The BFG

Hot Take: Spielberg is a master behind the camera and now, for the second film in a row, Mark Rylance is his secret weapon. It might be big budget kid’s fare but darn if it isn’t entertaining and wonderfully acted.

In the hands of Steven Spielberg, you can expect good things. The 1982 children’s story The BFG is the latest to get the Spielberg touch. The Roald Dahl children’s story which features a young girl who befriends a big, friendly giant and whisks away to Giant Country and Dream Country before the young girl, Sophie (Ruby Barnhill) comes up with a plan to help the BFG (a CGI-enhanced Mark Rylance) rid himself of his bigger brethren who both pick on BFG and happen to munch on children in their spare time. The story itself is purely juvenile with discussions of snozzcumbers (a foul-tasting vegetable grown in Giant Country), frobscottle (a bubbly concoction), whiz poppers (the flatulence caused by drinking frobscottle) and a number of other uniquely pronounced words specific to the BFG’s bungling of them.

The big-budget children’s movie is filled with marvelous imagery. There is rarely a time where you think what you’re seeing couldn’t be real despite the fact that the BFG is five times the size of Sophie. It comes as no surprise that Spielberg stretches out the film to nearly two hours as the magical images stretch on a little longer than necessary but it’s hard to blame him with the way everything looks that he might want to spend a few more minutes in this world of wonder and whimsy.

I guess the only knock on The BFG is since it’s saccharin sweet in presentation, the stakes never really feel all that high. At some point in these types of films, there is a point where you start to question whether or not the protagonists will find a happy ending even if you know there’s actually really no chance of a disappointing ending for them. In The BFG, there’s never that moment of dread. While there are perilous moments, there’s never any doubt our heroes will come through.

Despite these flaws, The BFG is fantastic kid’s fare. It might be a little too much for the youngest crowd (especially at the two hour time frame) but most kids should like if not love the movie. For adults, especially those familiar with the children’s book, there’s enough to keep the interest of those who chaperone the trip to the cinema.

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • TLC
    One thing that is ever present in The BFG is the tender, loving care Spielberg gives to the subject matter. The movie just oozes with passion. Spielberg has professed his love for the children’s book and there’s no doubting the authenticity of that proclamation.
  • The Relationship Between Sophie and BFG
    Brought to life by yet another remarkable performance from Mark Rylance and the auspicious début of Ruby Barnhill, Sophie and BFG form a memorable and rather adorable friendship that is unlikely to be erased.
  • Dream Country
    The images of Dream Country are some of the most spectacular in the film.

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • Can Young Children Sit For That Long?
    The real challenge of The BFG isn’t in the requirement of a suspension of disbelief but whether or not children, especially very young children, will be able to make it through the nearly two hour film without losing interest. The film doesn’t always rely on fantastic imagery to carry the audience’s attention and in those moments, if fatigue has set in, some children may be left behind.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2016-07-02
By: Brian Joseph
On: July 2, 2016
In: 2016, Hot Take
Previous Post: To See Or Not To See – July 1st: The Legend of Tarzan, The BFG, The Purge: Election Year & Our Kind of Traitor
Next Post: Hot Take: Swiss Army Man

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.