Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: Snowden

Hot Take: So-so retelling elevated by Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s excellent performance in a movie that’s way too long.

Oliver Stone’s mission in Snowden was to scare the bejesus out of us when it comes to our privacy. Snowden was just an end to justify the means. So, you almost have to evaluate the movie separate from Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s performance as Edward Snowden. And, in this case, we’ll talk about both separately.

Stone’s Snowden is one of his most conventional films to date. As titillating the subject of our privacy can be, Snowden is about as tame as anything Stone has ever done. Sure, he visually explains how our privacy may be compromised at any moment but chooses a very safe route in doing so. Where’s the Oliver Stone of the JFK days? A more sensationalized story might have been untrue to the subject matter but that’s never stopped him before and damn if it doesn’t make a better movie. Instead, Snowden is kind of a drag and lacks energy.

As for Joseph Gordon-Levitt as Edward Snowden, that’s where the meat and potatoes of the film are. Gordon-Levitt transforms into the man who exposed the U.S. Government and delivers a very convincing performance right down to Snowden’s unique voice patterns. He’s the most compelling thing to watching in the film and it’s one of those career-defining roles that people will remember longer than they remember the actual film. It’s still probably not Oscar-worthy but that has more to do with the mediocrity of the film than Gordon-Levitt’s performance.

The rest of the supporting cast delivers workmanlike performances. The only other actor who stands out is Shailene Woodley who plays Snowden’s girlfriend Lindsay Mills. It’s a sharp turn away from her recent work in the severely lacking Divergent series and shows that the promise she showed in movies like The Fault In Our Stars wasn’t an aberration.

Unfortunately, Snowden isn’t lean enough to avoid mediocrity and Stone’s restraint in his storytelling makes the film feel more like a stylized documentary than a feature film. His pom pom waving for the federal whistleblower is blatantly obvious, too, which then makes you question the authenticity of this side of the story. It’s heavy handed and the piling on gets a little boring. There’s no real sizzle. The government is bad. Snowden is good. We’re all being watched. It’s about as deep as it gets.

Unlike other Stone films, Snowden isn’t likely to whip anyone into a frenzy. Maybe that’s the time we’re living in more than Oliver Stone’s style. We knew a lot of this going into the film which makes Snowden less relevatory and more regurgitation. It’s been 25 years since JFK. The world’s a very different place, Mr. Stone.

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • Gordon-Levitt and Woodley
    The pair show great chemistry on screen and are a pleasure to watch whenever they are together. It takes some of the weight off of Gordon-Levitt from carrying the movie on his own, too.
  • A Worthy Topic
    Snowden might be unremarkable in its retelling but the topic is important and does raise a lot of questions about what is right and wrong when it comes to how far the government can legally dig into our private lives under the guise of keeping America safe.

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • Keeping the Film Safe
    It’s rare to see an Oliver Stone film that takes almost no risks. Snowden is that film. It’s very matter-of-fact and tries to stay as close to the truth as possible. Instead of sensationalizing events, Stone piles on which just becomes boring to watch. It’s preaching to the choir or yelling at a wall. Either way, the rather repetitive message gets stale.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2016-09-17
By: Brian Joseph
On: September 17, 2016
In: 2016, Hot Take
Previous Post: To See Or Not To See – September 16th: Blair Witch, Bridget Jones’s Baby, Snowden, Hillsong – Let Hope Rise, Mr. Church, Wild Oats, Victor & Miss Stevens
Next Post: Hot Take: Blair Witch

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.