Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: The Light Between Oceans

Hot Take: An emotional powder keg with an unnecessarily long fuse.

The Light Between Oceans has a lot going for it. Both Michael Fassbender and Alicia Vikander who fell in love during the filming of the movie appear very committed to their roles. The supporting cast bolstered by a very good performance by Rachel Weisz is complementary to the two star’s performances. The cinematography makes the film beautiful to look at. The characters feel authentic, the mood is set yet the story and all its contrivances fall short of anything more than mediocrity.

Unfortunately, The Light Between Oceans is painfully slow. The pace makes the story being told feel manipulative in its effort to tug at your emotions. Surely, it’s heart-wrenching to watch the story of two isolated lovers on a remote lighthouse island who try and fail to have a child twice only to have a baby wash up in a boat manned by a dead man. At that point, writer/director Derek Cianfrance knows exactly what he wants from his audience — tears! The rest of the movie is spent conditioning the audience for that response with more melodrama than a modern soap opera.

Does it work? Well, sure it does. The only thing is some people might mistake how tough it is to get through the last hour with some sort of emotional response rather than the fact that the film drags you to its conclusion. The work feels rather heavy in the third act to the point where you’re surprised someone doesn’t have an unexpected fatal illness or isn’t unexpectedly flattened by a bus. Fortunately, Fassbender and Vikander are still there and hold this one together the best they can. This isn’t the first time either one of these performers have made a film better by gracing it with their presence and surely won’t be the last.

So, bring tissues if you decide to see The Light Between Oceans. If you don’t at least get a little misty eyed by the end, you might want to check and see if you’re human.

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • The Obvious Chemistry Between Fassbender & Vikander
    MHT has gushed over Vikander before and will continue to as she is currently my favorite actress. Beside Fassbender who also consistently has been better than the movies he’s appeared in (X-Men: Apocalypse and Steve Jobs most recently), Vikander elevates an otherwise contrived and calculated film into something a little bit better than just a cheap attempt to get the audience to feel something. It’s no surprise the two fell in love on set, you almost can see it happening on screen.
  • Heart-Wrenching
    Even though it does it at an excruciatingly slow pace and feels canned rather than authentic at times, The Light Between Oceans does plenty to pull at your heart strings and it wouldn’t be surprising if you have hard time watching the last 15 minutes or so through blurry, teary vision.
  • It’s Beautiful to Watch
    Credit goes to Adam Arkapaw who was the director of photography on the film as the spectacular scenery makes the film easy to watch even when the elongated melodrama overstays its welcome on the screen.

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • Unnecessarily Long
    There is plenty the film could have done to tighten up the viewing experience without losing some of the melodramatic elements. The choice to stretch the film out to over 2 hours makes The Light Between Oceans feel like a grind.
  • Too Sudsy
    It’s unsurprising how many shots of ocean foam were used in the film. With the material derived from M.L. Stedman’s novel of the same name, the foam may have been more representative of how much of a soap opera this film really is rather than a feature film.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2016-09-10
By: Brian Joseph
On: September 10, 2016
In: 2016, Hot Take
Previous Post: To See Or Not To See – September 9th: Sully, The Wild Life, When the Bough Breaks, The Disappointments Room, Kicks & Dancer
Next Post: Hot Take: Sully

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.