Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: Deepwater Horizon

Hot Take: Compelling recount of the harrowing tale of the Deepwater Horizon oil disaster. This Peter Berg/Mark Wahlberg team produces some solid viewing.

Before the movie, the story of Deepwater Horizon wasn’t one I was familiar with. My guess is I heard of it when it occurred but didn’t pay attention enough to commit any details to memory. The Peter Berg directed “based on true events” disaster flick makes sure you pay attention and firmly points the finger at the big oil company for why such a disaster could occur. From beginning to end, the film’s pacing and detailed visuals of the disaster intertwining spectacular effects with some real life video mixed in make for both a strong indictment of BP Oil and a human interest piece about those who were injured and, in some cases, lost their lives due to the disaster.

Mark Wahlberg leads an ensemble cast and the gripping tale of the real life disaster upon an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico overshadows any performance in the film. It’s action packed and filled with cautionary tales of Big Oil trying to cut costs while risking the safety of its workers. While there are plenty of recognizable faces and a few decent scenes building up to the disaster, the film is really taken over by the harrowing explosions and devastating carnage of the Deepwater Horizon disaster. The explosion that killed 11 crewmen also caused the biggest oil spill in U.S. waters.

While Deepwater Horizon is compelling, there’s not a ton of substance to the disaster flick. There’s an extended look at Mike Williams (Wahlberg). The audience gets to know him before the disaster as he spends time with his wife (Kate Hudson) and daughter (Stella Allen). Outside of that, there’s very little character development as the focus is on the disaster and the corners cut by Big Oil in the moments leading up to the explosion.

If anything, Deepwater Horizon does a respectable job maintaining the feel of an action/disaster flick while honoring the memory of those lost and displaying the courage of those who survived. There are moments where the film feels almost Titanic-like in its depictions of some of the more shameful characters in the film and it doesn’t hurt the score has contributions from the late James Horner. If you’re looking for a movie where the intensity is turned up to white-knuckle level for more than 80% of the film, then Deepwater Horizon is the one you want to see.

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • Wahlberg/Berg
    This pairing works so well together. It’s hard to imagine the duo not making at least a competent film every time out.
  • John Malkovich’s Accent
    You thought his Russian accent in Rounders was something. Wait until you get a load of this.
  • The Catastrophic Visuals
    It’s an impressive work of visual hell as the rig engulfs in flame and explodes. It’s hellacious to watch and hard to imagine how scary these moments were for the survivors.

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • It’s Too Intense?
    At times, Deepwater Horizon is overwhelming. The disaster aspect and the familiarity it has to other fictional films makes it disturbing when you realize this actually happened.
  • Imbalance
    Because it is based in reality, the movie can never have the fun other films have with disasters. It also never achieves the emotional capacity others do because the spectacle of the catastrophe steals the show. Sometimes you just don’t know how to feel about what you’re watching.

 

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2016-10-10
By: Brian Joseph
On: October 10, 2016
In: 2016, Hot Take
Previous Post: From The Accountant to Boo! A Madea Halloween, October’s Anticipated Theatrical Releases, Ranked
Next Post: Hot Take: The Girl on the Train

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.