Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: Denial

Hot Take: More than adequate take on a true story that is really difficult to fathom although it’s a little easier to believe after last week’s election, if I’m being honest.

It might take a review or two to get all of the passive aggressive comments about last week’s election out of my system, so bear with me. Thanks to some arbitrary lines, the electoral college ignored the will of the people for the second time in my lifetime and now an Internet troll will be stationed in the White House and the media will be forced to call him President of the United States. Then again, this happened in 2000 and we didn’t bother to correct our flawed election process because, well, that might have been too difficult, I guess. And we saw how well that Presidency worked out, didn’t we? Anyway, moving on.

So, Denial. Based on the incredible true story of Deborah Lipstadt (Rachel Weisz) who was sued by Holocaust denier David Irving (Timothy Spall) for comments she made about Irving in a book about the Holocaust. In England, you can sue someone for libel and they are forced to defend themselves and prove their comments weren’t libel. In these cases you are guilty until proven innocent. Unlike the United States where you are innocent until proven guilty. Unless, of course, you are Hillary Clinton because then you are guilty even if you are cleared repeatedly. Anyway, back to Denial.

Overall, Denial was a pretty intriguing look at the case and the process of which Lipstadt had to go through to prove her innocence and also prove that Irving was indeed purposely misappropriating historical information to make a case that the Holocaust didn’t happen. It was different to watch a film about the Holocaust that focused on what occurred without the often difficult to watch imagery of other Holocaust films. The message was still as powerful even without the haunting visuals of Concentration Camps and the visual recreations of the torture and murder of Jews that occurred during World War II.

Weisz’s performance was especially impressive. Her take on Lipstadt wasn’t quite Oscar worthy but depending on how the Oscar season works out, it might get mentioned a few times as an outside shot of earning a nomination. The two main members of her legal team Anthony Julius and Richard Rampton were played expertly by Andrew Scott and Tom Wilkinson respectively. Scott and Wilkinson both delivered strong performances and Wilkinson especially was brilliant in the role of Rampton. As for Spall who played Irving, it was tough to decipher whether Spall’s performance was cartoonish or Irving’s character just lends itself to being described as a cartoon. I’d lean toward the latter but it could be the former.

In the end, Denial provides a low-key, matter of fact retelling that organically produces an emotional response to the unfolding events on screen. Rather than take an inciting method to earn the emotions of the audience, the film treats the details of the case with respect and takes a rather long and difficult legal proceeding and neatly fits it in just under 2 hours without losing any of the importance or gravity of the historical event.

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • Courtroom Scenes
    The courtroom scenes were well done and Wilkinson shines in those moments. The film lacks a theatrical vibe which makes these scenes feel more authentic and adds to the appeal of the film.
  • The Aftermath of Auschwitz
    The legal team and Lipstadt must visit Auschwitz early on in the film and these scenes are especially powerful without much effort from the filmmaker to add any artificial emotional string tugging making these scenes that much more impressive.
  • No One Grabbed Anyone By the Pussy
    Seriously, we now have a President who said that (among other horrible unacceptable things) and people still voted for him. At least this movie had none of that.

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • Subtle Might Be Too Sedating
    Denial is subtle in its telling and spends a lot of time doling out facts rather than incendiary moments. After the opening scene which is featured prominently in the trailer where Lipstadt and Irving square off at a Q&A for Lipstadt’s book, the film is noticeably lacking of these high drama scenes. This might bore a few.
  • Trolling
    Like our President-elect, Irving is a troll. He made it far in his trolling of Lipstadt and up until last week, we’d hope we could say at least it didn’t happen in the United States. Unfortunately, Irving’s success remained on the fringe, unlike our troll who has found his way to taking over the @POTUS account on Twitter. An Internet troll will actually be able to tweet from @POTUS. Let that sink in.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2016-11-13
By: Brian Joseph
On: November 13, 2016
In: 2016, Hot Take
Previous Post: BuRStS #39: Indignation, Phantom Boy & Sausage Party
Next Post: Hot Take: Inferno

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.