Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: Live By Night

Hot Take: Proof positive looks can be deceiving. So bad I had to double check the initial release date to see if this wasn’t a January release.

I am not a Ben Affleck hater. However, for those that are, Live By Night will offer enough fuel to burn down Gotham before he dodges one more question about his stand-alone Batman movie coming in a couple of years. The only two things Live By Night has going for it is that it is so entertainingly bad at times it becomes entertaining and the film is visually engaging which is a hat tip to Affleck, the director.

Despite his directing success, Affleck, the actor, doesn’t do himself any favors. And maybe it isn’t Affleck the actor’s fault since he wasn’t given much to work with from Affleck, the screenwriter. The clunky script featuring a simple one-dimensional plot has almost no redeeming qualities. There’s a plethora of talent attached to the film — Chris Cooper, Elle Fanning, Sienna Miller, Zoë Saldana, Anthony Michael Hall, Max Casella — but the resulting product is watchably bad.

At some point in between moments of unintentional laughter, I found myself Googling the release date of the film swearing a studio wouldn’t waste the Academy’s time by putting this on the December calendar as Live By Night felt comfortably at home on the January calendar where movie releases go to die. Alas, the film had a limited release in December as I guess it hoped the Academy was so drunk when they collectively watched it that it somehow snuck in a nomination.

The typical built-in audience for gangster flicks might find a few redeeming qualities in the film. There’s an entertaining chase scene here and a well shot shoot-out there. It’s confusing though as Joe Coughlin (Affleck) waffles back and forth between morality and immorality with a code so convoluted, if you actually did care about the character, you might wonder why he can’t make up his mind about what kind of man he wants to be. It’s doubtful you’ll care that much, though, as the film jumps from Boston to Tampa and follows Joe as he ditches his moral code and ascends toward the top of his adopted Mob family. Well, until all the double and triple crossing begins, of course. You know how typical gangster films go and this one decides to play up those conventions whenever it has the chance.

The resulting product is disastrous. If you’re anti-Affleck, Live By Night will have you cringing from the title screen to the credits. Thankfully, the visuals and the entertainingly bad script provide enough watchable moments for Live By Night to escape the “worst of” lists of 2016 but find itself firmly on the “bad films” of 2016.

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • Max Casella Lives!
    Those who’ve followed Neil Patrick Harris’s career back to when he was Doogie Howser, M.D. should recognize the name as Casella was Harris’s wisecracking best friend Vinny during the show’s run. Granted, he’s done 24 movies since the show (including the next film expected to be reviewed, Jackie)but I’m struggling to say something good about this film so I figured this would be a good time to recognize his performance as Digger, the son of the mob boss Affleck’s Joe Coughlin goes to work for.

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • A Rough Script
    It’s not just the paint-by-numbers storyline. It’s also the weak dialogue, poor character development and cliché approach to the Mob world that helps deliver a subpar cinema experience.
  • Longer Than Necessary
    The film comes in at just over 2 hours but could have easily accomplished the same result in 30 minutes less. Hell, it might have been better. Worst case scenario would have been it was shorter.
  • Too Pretty
    Typically, the gangster world has some grit to it. Not the world portrayed in Live By Night which is filled with pretty faces, stylish suits and lush scenery. It looks good but doesn’t fit the subject.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2017-01-16
By: Brian Joseph
On: January 16, 2017
In: 2016, Hot Take
Previous Post: Hot Take: Patriots Day
Next Post: Hot Take: Jackie

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.