Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: Ghost in the Shell

Hot Take: Visually, Ghost in the Shell is pretty damn impressive. Too bad the story isn’t the same as it feels like an overproduced facsimile of the source material.

Call me insensitive. I was never overly affected by whitewashing in films. It could because I’m white and suffer from white privilege as much as the next white guy or girl. After watching Ghost in the Shell, though, you can call me woke. Full disclosure: I love Scarlett Johansson on the big screen. She’s one of my favorite actresses. This probably explains more of why I wasn’t bothered by the choice of Johansson to play the main character of the live action version of the immensely popular 1995 Japanese animation of the same name (not to mention the original manga which actually launched the concept.). However, seeing Johansson in the main role, two thoughts consistently entered my head: (1) Johansson gives an excellent performance and (2) she’s completely wrong for the part.

Ironically, the film resembles its plot. On the outside, it’s beautiful and almost visually flawless. On the inside, it feels synthetic and disconnected. Johansson’s performance isn’t necessarily the problem. However, the fact that Johansson is an American portraying a character that is obviously Asian is constantly present. There are scenes that remind you of this throughout. It’s never addressed. The main character — a highly curious cyborg — seeks out her previous identity but never cares to seek out what she looked like before she was a cyborg. I guess if you were made to look like Scarlett Johansson, you wouldn’t be that upset about losing your identity?

The film goes further than Johansson with its whitewashing as her initial target is Hideo Kuze, a cyborg like her that failed to meet the standards of Hanka Robotics and now seeks revenge on the company Johansson’s Major Mira Killian works for, is a character of obvious Asian origin but played by Michael Pitt. Pitt might actually be whiter than me. It speaks to how tone deaf this film is in its haphazard recreation of a classic.

Its not just the whitewashing that’s a problem. Johansson as the main character draws direct comparisons to her previous roles. Her performance isn’t that far off from the alien she plays in Under the Skin or the titular character in Lucy. Hell, it isn’t that far removed from Black Widow in her various supporting roles in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Johansson has established herself as a strong enough actress that she doesn’t need to continue to replicate previous roles other than the obvious fact that she collected a hefty payday for her part.

Because of the casting, you begin to question whether the filmmakers trust the audience’s intelligence enough to handle the concepts the original manga and animated film put forth. Like it or not, the 1995 film is much deeper than this glossy Hollywood remake. What ends up happening is that the film offers nothing new. And not just in the realm of the Ghost in the Shell universe. Hollywood has beaten the cyborg idea to death in recent years and topped out with Ex Machina two years ago. On top of that, through its obvious whitewashing (which the film doesn’t even bother to try to explain or address in any way, shape or form), the filmmakers reveal an insensitivity and lack of confidence in the source material that it can live on its own. Johansson was brought in to sell tickets but the lazy, safe casting does more harm than good and, in the end, while Scarlett’s acting resume remains relatively untarnished (her performance is solid), the overall result is a failure.

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • They Know How to Make An Entrance
    Some of the most stunning visuals come during some fairly impressive entrance sequences. The Major, especially, knows how to make an entrance as one of the most visually stunning scenes is when Major enters a restaurant from the roof of a skyscraper.

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • The Film’s Ghost
    As mentioned a few times, the film looks great. However, the original animated film sets a bar this film never comes close to clearing. It actually feels like it purposely goes under the bar for fear of never clearing it. It sticks to Hollywood convention and becomes a standard Sci-Fi/action thriller with conventional plot drivers and a predictable conclusion.
  • The Whitewashing Effect
    The film never escapes this valid criticism and actually contributes further to this by some of its choices throughout. Essentially, this remake proves to be a reminder of how tone deaf Hollywood can be.

 

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2017-04-08
By: Brian Joseph
On: April 8, 2017
In: 2017, Hot Take
Previous Post: From The Circle to Smurfs: Lost Village, April’s Anticipated Theatrical Releases, Ranked
Next Post: Hot Take: The Zookeeper’s Wife

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.