Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: Samson

Hot Take: This future $3.96 DVD at Walmart is tacky, campy and sanitized by the studio. Sometimes they don’t make ’em like they used to because they shouldn’t. 

Pure Flix is best known for their series of God’s Not Dead movies. They’ve cashed in twice on the series with a third on the way but still find time to make other faith-based films to attempt to satisfy their Christian fan base. Samson is the latest effort from the faith-based studio as it takes on an R-rated tale from the Bible and attempts to clean it up for a more PG audience. In its cleansing efforts, Pure Flix strips away much of the story and leaves what feels like a highlight reel of the Samson tale while leaving out any of the really messy parts. It fails to work on so many levels not the least of which are two rather uncharismatic leads with Taylor James looking like rejected WWE talent as Samson and Caitlin Leahy as Delilah. At times, it even feels like something more suited for the History Channel or some other B-list cable network attempting to dabble in original content.

If you’re unfamiliar with the Biblical tale of Samson, he’s basically the Biblical Hercules who derives his power from his hair. The film takes us all the way back to his younger days where he first discovers his power and also his wandering eye for the female species. It’s obvious that women are to be Samson’s downfall as he first meets Taren (Frances Sholto-Douglas), a Philistine whom Samson falls for. This relationship has a tragic end but Samson doesn’t learn his lesson and eventually falls for Delilah who is being used by Rallah (Jackson Rathbone), the son of the Philistine king, to find out the source of Samson’s strength. She discovers it is his hair and gives Samson a haircut but eventually, Samson discovers his inner strength and turns turmoil into victory.

Did I give too much away? Considering how far removed this tale is from the Biblical tale, maybe I have. While the film is loosely based on the tale of Samson, it sticks only to the milestones and waters down much of the more barbaric proceedings. That’s not to say Samson doesn’t rip through the Philistines in a few on-screen battles but even then, it’s somewhat removed from the actual tale. Even his philandering ways are somewhat watered down for the big screen. Pure Flix takes every effort to cleanse the film but, in doing so, removes any teeth the tale might have. Rather than being a cautionary tale, it’s more celebratory of the power of faith and less about learning from mistakes and more about showing off the great power God can have, especially when you’re facing down 1,000s of Philistines after getting a bad haircut.

Even the most ardent Christian won’t lose sleep by sitting out Samson. Its failure to stick to any semblance of the message of the original Biblical tale is only outdone by its failure to entertain. Lack of charisma from the main stars, a general sense of campiness, sluggish pacing and total lack of passion are its ultimate downfall. It’s as if the Samson & Delilah tale had received a haircut of its own by the creatives hired by Pure Flix. Better yet, a scalping.

Why Watch?

You’re working on a pilot for a Mystery Science Theater 3000 re-boot and looking for the perfect modern day film to use.

Why Skip?

You aren’t interested in the watered down version of one of the Bible’s more scandalous tales.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2018-02-19
By: Brian Joseph
On: February 19, 2018
In: 2018, Hot Take
Previous Post: Hot Take: Fifty Shades Freed
Next Post: Hot Take: Peter Rabbit

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.