Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: Mile 22

Hot Take: If you weren’t over the Peter Berg/Mark Wahlberg machine before Mile 22, you might be now. The film’s only saving grace is Iko Uwais’s action scenes. Other than that, there’s not much to see here.

If bloodshed, bullets and Mark Wahlberg being Mark Wahlberg is your thing, you should run (not walk) to the theater to see Mile 22. Not necessarily because Mile 22 is a great movie, (It’s not!) but more importantly because it’s likely poor box office performance should see that 3,520 opening theater count drop not dwindle in the coming weeks. Directed by Peter Berg, it makes for the fourth partnership between the two and it’s easily the least entertaining flick of the quartet. Basically, Mile 22 is an awful combination of Mission: Impossible, The Accountant and the Bourne series. Wahlberg fails to even bring his best Mark Wahlberg and the supporting cast fails to add anything to the movie.

When John Malkovich first appears on screen, you quickly ask yourself, “Where has this guy been?” After a few minutes, Malkovich leaves such a bad impression that you no longer wonder why he’s basically disappeared. There’s Ronda Rousey who has made the jump from UFC to WWE and has been criticized for her lack of mic work since making the jump to the more theatrical wrestling ring. In Mile 22, Rousey is a one-dimensional, foul mouthed member of Wahlberg’s team whose acting can best be described as hollow. The only supporting character to add anything to the film is Iko Uwais who is the package that Wahlberg’s team must deliver to safety to prevent a potential terrorist attack as he holds the key to shut down a weapon of mass destruction. Ironically, Uwais’s Li Noor doesn’t need much protection as he can seemingly kick anyone’s ass that gets in his way. Uwais is a throwback to 80s and 90s action flicks but gets less screen time than necessary to carry this film failure.

The worst aspect of Mile 22 is its lazy character development. For Wahlberg’s James Silva, the expanse of his development is a yellow rubber band that he keeps snapping on his wrist. There’s a quick scene that flashes that might be a young James talking about how smart he is but there’s so many jump cuts and shaky camera footage, it’s hard to really keep up. Actually, it’s hard to care. Rousey’s character has no back story. She curses a lot. That’s about it. The actress who gets the most screen time is Lauren Cohen who plays Alice and is likely the team member Wahlberg’s character is most protective of. Alice is struggling with her life in the CIA since it takes her away from her daughter. It’s scary that Alice can’t communicate with her ex-husband through an app without cursing which the app won’t even allow. You’d think someone smart enough to be a member of a top secret military agency would be swift enough to avoid cursing in a heated moment with her ex-husband who is needling her about birthday cupcakes.

Mile 22 is a slog of a film despite it’s non-stop action. It’s a heavy 90 minutes and fails to capitalize on its greatest assets. To be fair, I’ve never been kind to Wahlberg but he’s definitely capable of more than what he delivers in Mile 22. Berg and Wahlberg will get a chance to redeem themselves, though, since they’re working on a fifth collaboration. Meanwhile, the only collaboration I’ll be looking forward to from Wahlberg is my next visit to Wahlburgers because that dude did conjure up a hell of a burger joint. On the movie side, not so much.

Why Watch?

You still feel the vibration of Marky Mark’s acting work.

Why Skip?

Do we really need another action flick about a top secret government operation doing top secret things to protect the world?

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2018-08-22
By: Brian Joseph
On: August 22, 2018
In: 2018, Hot Take
Previous Post: Hot Take: Eighth Grade
Next Post: Hot Take: Mission: Impossible – Fallout

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.