Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: Destination Wedding

Hot Take: It tries too hard sometimes and feels like an odd combination of Before Sunrise and Curb Your Enthusiasm BUT Destination Wedding is still worth the trip.

Keanu Reeves and Winona Ryder have worked together before. Destination Wedding happens to be their 4th film together though it takes a Google to remember anything beyond Bram Stoker’s Dracula. (That’s why I’m not holding it against Entertainment Weekly’s Maureen Lee Lenker who failed to mention The Private Lives of Pippa though the two weren’t necessarily together in that film which could be why it wasn’t mentioned, too.) They’ve known each other for nearly 30 years and it’s obvious the two enjoy each other’s company. That’s what made their pairing so unusual as Destination Wedding tried to get rolling. In the beginning, it was hard to imagine these two not liking each other despite the fact the characters they portrayed were supposed to not care for each other’s company much. However, as the film progresses and as their relationship evolves through a number of forced pairings at a destination wedding (hence, the title Destination Wedding), the fact that Reeves and Ryder play off each other so well helps them win over the audience, if they didn’t check out early on.

Lindsay (Ryder) and Frank (Reeves) don’t seem to care for each other much. They meet at a small airport headed to Paso Robles for the same wedding. Before they even know they’re headed to the same location, their paths cross and Frank’s duplicitous attempt to sneak ahead of Lindsay to board their flight is met with disdain. Despite both of their efforts to get on the plane early, the pair get stuck in the only 2 seats adjoining on this 8 person flight (The film’s best example of trying too hard) and they immediately begin bickering throughout the flight. The scene which involves their inability to open a bag of peanuts (There’s that hint of Curb) and one of the film’s many Before Sunrise-esque banter the characters share. From there on, it’s lather, rinse, repeat as the pair continue to run into each other and become each other’s de facto wedding dates for lack of a better description as Lindsay confronts her ex-fiancee (Whose wedding it is) and Frank confronts the family he keeps his distance from. (The groom is also his brother.)

There’s plenty going on here and way too many coincidences and conveniences to be a great film, however, it nails enough funny (sometimes hilarious) moments that Destination Wedding succeeds. Essentially, it’s Reeves and Ryder and their ability to play off of each other that carries the film as the script has a habit of being verbose. It’s designed for an older crowd but not too old to feel out of touch. The cynicism is heavy and it’s dark, bitter tone might be too much for some to bear. Though the audience I saw it with were audibly laughing throughout which isn’t something you often see achieved in a small theater with a handful of people.

Whether to head to Destination Wedding or not may boil down to your affinity for Reeves and/or Ryder. If these are two performers you can get behind, you’ll be able to look past the film’s obvious flaws and enjoy the parts that click. There’s enough of them to make for a satisfying viewing experience and enough memorable moments to keep you chatting beyond the flick if the topic of “What did you see recently?” comes up.

Why Watch?

Reeves and Ryder are delightful even at their most caustic and sardonic.

Why Skip?

Reality is too cynical at the moment to enjoy such a film.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2018-09-13
By: Brian Joseph
On: September 13, 2018
In: 2018, Hot Take
Previous Post: Hot Take: Peppermint
Next Post: Hot Take: The Predator

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.