Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
Movie Hot Take

Wasting $8 On Popcorn So You Don't Have To...

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Movies of 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Hot Take: Sleepless

Hot Take: A complete waste of time. Welcome to January!

Sometimes you see an actor and you wonder what were they thinking? Immediately after seeing Sleepless, a lazy remake of 2011 French thriller Sleepless Night, I Googled, “How much did Jamie Foxx get paid to make Sleepless?” I didn’t find an answer but I have to imagine it was a decent payday considering how bad the movie was. We’re talking about the guy who played Ray Charles and Django in one of the most cliché action movies in recent memory.

Everything you expect to happen, happens in Sleepless. At some point, you might feel a telepathic connection with the movie screen as everything you think unfolds on screen. Foxx’s performance is terrible but it’s not much worse than any other performance in the film. It’s hard to blame Foxx completely since there are creative minds around the set who could have fixed some of the film’s most glaring issues.

For example, early on in the film, Foxx’s Vincent Downs, an undercover cop trying to bust a major crime family, is stabbed in the gut as his son (Octavius J. Johnson) is abducted from his car as the two share a bonding moment over how to shoot a gun (after arguing for a few minutes about how Downs is never around for his family). For the rest of the film, Foxx turns the pain of his bleeding gut off and on. Sometimes it hurts so much, he can’t run. Sometimes he’s perfectly fine, even as he takes repeated punches to the very place he was stabbed.

This is indicative of the movie’s consistency. There are a number of scenes that just don’t jive. Whether it be Foxx’s decision to mutter and grumble every line he delivers or action scenes you’ve seen done better in other films. How many times are we going to see a parking garage chase scene? (And this is one of the most disappointing in recent memory.)

You also have to wonder why they bothered gathering such a talented cast. The aforementioned Foxx is joined by Michelle Monaghan, Gabrielle Union and Dermot Mulroney who all must have had gaping holes in their schedules and all needed a new pool in the backyard. Even the lesser known Scoot McNairy who plays the obligatory morally bankrupt baddie in the movie has proven to be better than this in other films. About the only casting that makes sense here is T.I. who plays Foxx’s partner Sean Cass but even T.I.’s resume shows he’s capable of better than what we get from Sleepless.

If you love “B” action movies and really have nothing better to do, I’d still recommend avoiding Sleepless. It does very little but establish that it will be run on repeat overnight as cable movie filler in the not so distant future. Ironically, Sleepless won’t keep those awake who happen to come across it in the wee hours of the morning when it finally finds its place in the world.

“Spoiler Free” Pros

  • Sometimes the Action is Laugh Out Loud Bad
    There are a few scenes in which the audience experienced unintentional outbursts of laughter. You know it’s unintentional, too, because not everyone laughed at the same time. However, at some point, it seemed like everyone laughed at something so there’s a positive, I guess. Even if the movie had no intentions of being funny.

“Spoiler Free” Cons

  • Predictable
    This almost serves as an amalgam of every bad corrupt cop movie you’ve ever seen. It makes last year’s Triple 9 look like an Academy Award winner.
  • Gutsy Inconsistency
    Foxx’s bleeding gut is surely not the only inconsistency but it is the most glaring. The only reason you might miss more inconsistencies is because it doesn’t take long to realize this isn’t a movie worth paying much attention to.
  • Casino Games
    The casino setting the movie eventually settles in is about as believable as the fact that we elected a rotten tangerine with an itchy Twitter finger as President.

 

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Related

2017-01-21
By: Brian Joseph
On: January 21, 2017
In: 2017, Hot Take
Previous Post: Hot Take: Silence
Next Post: Hot Take: Split

Recent Posts

  • If You’re Trying to Explain Away the Death of Rayshard Brooks, You Don’t Want to See the Systemic Problem
  • The Rise, Fall and Suicide Letter of MoviePass
  • Hot Take: Second Act
  • The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Hot Take: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse

Recent Comments

  • Scott on Hot Take: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
  • BobJ27 on Hot Take: Second Act
  • Bob J. on The First 25 Movies of the Next 100 Movies of 2018, Graded
  • Brian Joseph on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet
  • Bob J. on Hot Take: Ralph Breaks the Internet

Categories

  • #5LinkMinimum (4)
  • 10 Things (6)
  • 1968 (1)
  • 1980 (1)
  • 1981 (2)
  • 1985 (1)
  • 1988 (1)
  • 2006 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 2014 (5)
  • 2015 (127)
  • 2016 (270)
  • 2017 (169)
  • 2018 (133)
  • 7 Days (6)
  • Burning Questions (1)
  • BuRStS (86)
  • Hot Take (662)
  • Lists (24)
  • music videos (1)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Ranked (43)
  • Spoiler Alert (1)
  • To See or Not To See (32)
  • Top Movies (7)
  • Trailers (120)
  • TV Shows (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Weigh In (13)

Archives

  • June 2020 (1)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (6)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (10)
  • September 2018 (9)
  • August 2018 (16)
  • July 2018 (16)
  • June 2018 (16)
  • May 2018 (9)
  • April 2018 (18)
  • March 2018 (11)
  • February 2018 (17)
  • January 2018 (12)
  • December 2017 (7)
  • November 2017 (13)
  • October 2017 (15)
  • September 2017 (14)
  • August 2017 (20)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (16)
  • May 2017 (24)
  • April 2017 (25)
  • March 2017 (17)
  • February 2017 (17)
  • January 2017 (25)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (23)
  • October 2016 (24)
  • September 2016 (26)
  • August 2016 (28)
  • July 2016 (25)
  • June 2016 (32)
  • May 2016 (38)
  • April 2016 (36)
  • March 2016 (31)
  • February 2016 (26)
  • January 2016 (23)
  • December 2015 (19)
  • November 2015 (40)
  • October 2015 (34)
  • September 2015 (51)
  • August 2015 (25)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Designed using Dispatch. Powered by WordPress.